Maizex Production Guide 2024

Management Disease Ratings Agronomic Ratings Positioning Response to Intensive Management Geography Final Seeding Population Seedling Vigour Plant Height # Kernel Rows Stalk Strength Plant Health Grain Drydown Test Weight NCLB ANTH • Above-average response to intensive management • Responds favourably to fungicide • Excels in variable-yield environments 7 Moves south of zone 32-34 9 T 16-18 9 8 8 8 8 7 • Average response to fungicide • Above-average responses to nitrogen and plant population • Ideal for delayed harvest 8 Moves south of zone 34-36 9 T 16-18 8 8 8 8 7 8 • Excels in variable-yield environments • Favourable response to fungicide • Average response to intensive management 7 Moves north and south of zone 34-36 8 S-M 16-18 8 8 8 8 7 8 • Target moderate plant populations • Excellent dual-purpose option UR Position in zone 32-34 9 T 18-20 8 9 8 7 7 8 • Improved response to fungicides under high population • Target plant populations to match yield environment 7 Moves north of zone 32-34 9 M 18-20 8 8 9 7 8 7 • Responds well to fungicide • Stable performance across a wide range of environments • Ideal for delayed harvest 5 Position in zone 34-36 8 T 18-20 9 8 8 8 7 8 • Predicted less favourable response to fungicide and increased population • Ideal for delayed harvest and dual purpose UR Position in zone 32-34 8 T 16-18 9 8 9 8 8 9 • Above-average response to an increase in population in combination with nitrogen • Average response to fungicide • Ideal for delayed harvest 8 Position in zone 34-36 8 M 16-18 9 9 8 8 8 8

RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy NDAxMjI=