Management Disease Ratings Agronomic Ratings Positioning Response to Intensive Management Geography Final Seeding Population Seedling Vigour Plant Height # Kernel Rows Stalk Strength Plant Health Grain Drydown Test Weight NCLB ANTH • Predicted below-average response to intensive management • Excellent stability across environments UR Moves north and south of zone 32-34 8 S-M 14-16 9 9 8 8 8 7 • Below-average response to intensive management • Excellent stability across environments 2 Moves north and south of zone 32-34 8 S-M 14-16 9 9 8 8 8 7 • Average response to fungicide • Above-average response to population • Excellent dual-purpose option 5 Moves north and south of zone 34-36 9 T 16-18 9 9 8 8 8 7 • Moderate response to population • Favourable response to fungicide and additional nitrogen • Excels in high-yield environments 8 Moves south of zone 32-34 8 M 16-18 9 8 8 8 8 UR • Above-average response to population • Excels in variable soils • Excellent dual-purpose option 7 Moves north of zone 34-36 8 T 14-16 9 8 8 9 8 6 • Responds to increased population • Reserve highest populations for high-yielding fields 5 Moves north of zone 34-36 9 M 14-16 8 8 8 9 8 8 • Predicted moderate response to population • Ideal for delayed harvest • Predicted favourable response to fungicides UR Moves south of zone 32-34 8 T 18-20 9 8 9 9 7 8 • Favourable response to fungicide • Less response to increased population • Ideal for delayed harvest UR Moves south of zone 30-32 8 T 16-18 9 8 8 7 7 7
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy NDAxMjI=